Topic: Drunk Driving

Are Automobile Fumes More Deadly Than North Carolina Auto Accidents Themselves?

March 30, 2012, by Michael A. DeMayo

Auto accidents in North Carolina and elsewhere in our union take the lives of 40,000 million a year, injure millions more, and lead to untold indirect costs for the victims, their family members, their coworkers and associates, and society as a whole.
But what if automobiles are even more deadly as instruments of pollution than they are as instruments of destruction?

This may sound far-fetched. After all, 40,000 deaths a year is an enormous amount. But it is at least possible, given some science and suggestive research, to build a case that the pollution exuded by cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other transportation vehicles causes or contributes to thousands of deaths in the U.S. every year – perhaps more.

Witness, for instance, pretty scary epidemiological evidence that shows that people who live within a mile or so of Los Angeles’ notoriously congested freeways (like the 405) are substantially at greater risk for diseases like heart disease, asthma, and other respiratory problems. Now, not every person who inhales the pollution from the 405 is going to get heart disease and die from it. But the quality of life certainly might be affected. That person might have less energy. That person might be less able to think effectively and deal with emergency situations. So if the pollution itself directly kills, say, a few hundred people in the Los Angeles area alone annually (making those numbers up), maybe the indirect effect of the pollution could wreak yet more havoc.

Imagine, for instance, a person who lives in an apartment that’s abutting the freeway – who inhales massive amounts of particulate matter and toxins every day – and thus suffers deterioration in cognitive capacity. It’s easy to imagine that that person would get hurt at work easier or more easily lose his balance and slipping and suffer a terrible slip and fall. If you extrapolate and really think about the indirect consequences of our exposure to pollution – particularly in major cities like Los Angeles and goodly sized cities like Raleigh – perhaps our safety experts should be focused not just on car accident prevention in North Carolina but also on car pollution prevention.

Whether or not you agree with this thesis, hopefully you are getting to appreciate the holistic nature of auto accident science. As a victim – or a family member of a victim – in a recent car crash, you probably have a very specific way you’ve been thinking about the accident. You “know” who might be to blame, what kind of compensation you deserve and so forth. But to get best results, you need to look at your problems from different angles and get advice from objective, qualified resources, like a North Carolina auto accident law firm.

More Web Resources:

Air Pollution in Los Angeles near the 405

How bad is our automobile pollution problem?

Small Factors Add Up and Cause North Carolina Car Accidents

March 9, 2012, by Michael A. DeMayo

When we discuss North Carolina car accidents, we often oversimplify. For instance, you may learn about a driver who fell asleep behind the wheel and crashed into a school bus. You’d thus be likely leap to blame the driver’s lazyness or negligence for the catastrophe. This analysis might be correct. But we should not overlook simple, subtle, small things that can accumulate to create enhanced risk for accidents.

Consider, for instance, the fact that national holidays like the 4th of July, New Year’s Eve, and Super Bowl Sunday are more “dangerous” than normal days of the week. Why? The hypothesis is that more drivers, on average, drink and party on those days. Thus, there are more drunken drivers on the road. Thus, there are more drunk and driving related accidents.

Sounds simple enough, right?

But this idea hides a complex lesson. For instance, say in a typical town, you would have 20 DUI crashes on any given day; on a national holiday, you’d have 40 DUI crashes. But it’s not like only 20 people “got more drunk” than they normally would. The town’s population, as a whole, drank more than normal. So what you are seeing with these stats is a threshold effect! There probably were A LOT of people who drank a little more than they normally would. But the vast majority didn’t get into accidents because they did not reach the accident threshold – a combination of luck, genetics, etc.

We almost always pay attention to evidence above this threshold – seeing the DUI driver who caused an accident – but we don’t have a way of measuring the “dog that didn’t bite” – the DUI driver who got home safely.

Here is another way to think about this. Most people would never riot at a bar. But imagine if you’re at a bar, and your team wins. Suddenly people start getting rowdy and crazy and throwing chairs. You might “join the fun” and throw a glass or tip over a barstool or do something out of exuberance to be part of the crowd. You would never normally do that. But the social permission changes your behavior.

The moral is: we need to pay attention to small cumulative “things” that provoke us and misbehave on the road – driving under the influence of medication, for instance, or driving while fatigued, or driving long distances on roads that you are not used to driving on, etc. All these below the radar factors can influence your ability to drive safely.

If someone hurt you or someone you love in a car crash, an experienced car accident law firm in North Carolina can help you create a strategy to obtain justice and substantial compensation.

More Web Resources:

Small Causes Add Up To Big Effects

The Threshold Effect

North Carolina Fatal DUI Accident Nets Man 15-Year Jail Sentence

February 17, 2012, by Michael A. DeMayo

Last August, a fatal North Carolina DUI accident took the life of 51-year-old motorcyclist, Larry Weaver on Highway 221. Weaver lost his life when Brian Robinson, 22, slammed into his bike with his GMC pickup and dragged Weaver over 300 feet. When South Carolina police officers arrived at the scene, they tested Robinson for alcohol. He confessed to having drunk some beers and two shots of vodka, as well as doing a hit of marijuana. A blood test found that he had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.52%, more than six times North Carolina’s state limits.

In addition to the 15-year jail sentence, Robinson must serve 12 years before becoming eligible for parole. Robinson had been convicted of drug violations several times prior to the fatal North Carolina DUI accident.

Our hearts go out to Weaver’s family, as well as to Robinson’s family. Horrific car accidents like these are difficult to put into context. What do they mean? What can we learn from them? Who should be punished, and how? These are questions that we can and should discuss and debate. But we also need to take time to reflect on the fundamental scariness of what it means to be a North Carolina driver. Every time you take your car out on to the road and you return home safely, count your blessings. It can be a dangerous world out there, and you never know when danger is going to strike.

Of course, picking up the pieces after a car accident is often extremely painful. You are disoriented, confused, frustrated, angry, and a rainbow of other emotions. You may have a hard time figuring out where to start to rebuild your life and hold people responsible, if you have the energy and will power to start at all.

It’s not necessary to struggle or figure out everything on your own. With the guidance of a passionate, thorough, and experienced North Carolina car accident law firm, you can make surprisingly rapid progress. Although you may be in a very difficult place right now, you can make progress toward recovering your dignity and composure, obtaining compensation, holding the right people accountable, and generally putting the pieces of your life back together again.

More Web Resources:

Fatal North Carolina DUI Accident Nets Man 15-year Jail Sentence

The Highest BAC Reading of All Time?

North Carolina Car Accident Theory – Talking to the Driver Who Just Hit You

February 7, 2012, by Michael A. DeMayo

After a North Carolina auto accident – even a minor one, such as a fender bender at a red light or a scrape on the freeway – you enter a kind of primitive physiological state. Your body knows that it’s under threat, and stress reactions kick in. Your adrenaline may jack up. Your blood pressure may rise. You may experience extreme anger as well as focus. If you’re injured, your body may go into shock. A lot of things happen, both psychologically and physically, in other words – even if the accident is minor.

When you get out of your vehicle and talk to the driver or motorcyclist or trucker who hit you, you’re still operating, physiologically, from this primitive state. It’s normal, in such a situation, to feel extreme animosity and anger because you’ve had your need for safety fundamentally threatened. So, you may end up saying or even doing things that you would never do in “real life.” You might curse at an old lady or threaten to punch a scared teenager. You might make accusations that have no bearing or, conversely, apologizing for something that you didn’t even do. Some of these communication mistakes are unfortunate but inconsequential. If you call an old lady an SOB, you might regret it later, but it might not hurt your potential to obtain compensation in North Carolina auto accident case. But if you engage in other behaviors – such as admitting fault as a “gut reaction” when you weren’t indeed in fact at fault, that admission can come back to haunt your case.

To protect yourself from ever having to be in this position, you need to practice how to communicate with people while you’re under stress. Techniques abound to help people become better listeners and more calm and cool in dangerous circumstances. One philosophy of communication you may wish to explore is Dr. Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication philosophy. Rosenberg teaches his students to listen for the “feelings and needs” behind aggressive and angry external statements. For instance, the driver who cursed at you may not be angry because at “you;” rather, he is angry because his need for safety was not met. It’s a subtle distinction, but it’s an important one, since it liberates you from responsibility for other people’s feelings. Likewise, when you get in contact with your own feelings and needs, you are less likely to “take things personally” and more likely to be resourceful, compassionate, and even empathetic in situations where you are under stress.

Learning NVC communication is by no means easy or simple or intuitive. But Rosenberg’s students have compiled many anecdotes in which NVC training helped them to deal with extremely such stressful situations – being robbed, being threatened in public, etc. By connecting with yourself and with others at moments of anger, you can defuse situations that could otherwise turn ugly and also protect and preserve your chances for maximizing justice and obtaining the best possible recovery and resolution.

More Web Resources;

What Happens to the Brain During Periods of Extreme Stress

Nonviolent Communication Website

Preventing North Carolina Car Accidents through Analysis and Data

January 29, 2012, by Michael A. DeMayo

Tragic North Carolina car accidents often attract the attention of police, investigators, and sometimes the news media and general public.

But “near-miss” accidents attract the attention of practically no one at all – save for the drivers whose hearts skipped a few beats as they contemplated what could have just happened.

Chances are, you’ve been involved in a few “near-miss” situations yourself. There is a lot that you can learn from these situations – information that could be useful for helping you and other drivers avoid injury accidents and improve driving skills.

Accidents Are Aberrations

Odds are that drivers experience far more “near misses” than they do actual accidents. Since we don’t pay attention to these near misses, they are less salient, and we may tend to discount their relevance. In fact, it’s not uncommon for drivers who’ve just “nearly missed” getting into serious collisions to forget about what happened by the time they arrive home or at their destination.

But these near misses may hold powerful clues about your driving behavior, attitudes, and weaknesses. By attending to them – identifying what happened, who was involved, how you went wrong (or right), etc. – you can shore up your most glaring weaknesses and inculcate new, better, and safer behaviors.

How to Do It

The key is to collect data.

Every time you’re involved in a “near-miss” accident — after you stop driving and are in a safe place — write down exactly what happened in as much detail as possible. Identify more information than you think is necessary – dates, who was involved, how you felt before and afterwards, what you think caused it, etc.

Likewise, journal any time after anything extraordinary happens on the road. As a general point, the more information you have about your driving – and the more specific that information is – the more good data you can mune to understand your driving habits.

Why do this? Isn’t it time consuming and annoying?

Perhaps. But car accidents are one of the biggest non-disease killers of North Carolinians. So it’s worth your time to pay attention to and prevent auto disasters.

For help understanding actionable, specific tactics and strategies you can use to hold someone accountable for what happened to you, connect with a North Carolina auto accident law firm right now.

More Web Resources:

“Near-miss” accidents

Using journaling to understand and change your behaviors

The Fred Flintstone problem part 2: What drivers with caveman brains can do to thwart North Carolina car accidents

August 18, 2011, by Michael A. DeMayo

In a recent post on the relevance of evolution to theory about North Carolina car accidents (what can and cannot be done to solve our country and state’s motor vehicle accident problem), we touched on the idea that the root cause of vehicle crashes may be completely insoluble.

Basically, our brains evolved in Paleolithic times to deal with Paleolithic conditions. One might speculate about how our Paleolithic ancestors lived. But chances are they did not spend a significant percentage of their day riding across concrete landscapes at speeds approaching and exceeding 70 miles per hour. Even the occasional Grok who managed to hitch a ride on the back of a cheetah probably did not last long enough to take such a joyride more than once or twice.

So we face a dilemma, as people who want to end the problem of North Carolina car accidents. How can we engineer cars, roads, driver behavior, etc., to minimize risks, given that we have this fundamental constraint?

Obviously, this blog cannot hope to solve the problem in one fell swoop. But if you need help with a specific car accident question (for instance, if a drunk and driver hit you, or if a truck drove you off the road into a ditch and now you are injured and sick), a North Carolina car accident law firm can help you to deal with your specific legal, logistical, and other concerns.

Beyond that, maybe we can start a dialogue about more constructive ways to think about road safety. Because once we accept this fundamental “caveman constraint” on road safety engineering, we can contextualize engineering features that have already worked or might work. For instance, let’s think about reaction time. Paleolithic people in no way and shape or form had to confront super-fast decision making – like swerving at the last minute to avoid a truck travelling 80 miles per hour.

But we did evolve sensitive mechanisms to help us during normal flight and fight responses. For instance, when our Grok ancestors engaged in battle with saber-toothed tigers, they needed to respond rapidly to stressful conditions during the hunt, so we have evolved sensitive mechanisms that can help us react at the last second. The question is: How do we tap into those natural, spring-like mechanisms to react to a predator and apply them to engineer safer cars, better roads, smarter drivers, better signage, etc.?

We’ll leave the specifics to engineers. But just thinking in terms of this paradigm – the caveman driver paradigm – should allow us some new and cool insights that could lead to better engineering solutions.

More Web Resources:

Who is Grok?

What Did Grok Eat?

An End to All Serious North Carolina Car Accidents? A Thought Experiment

August 9, 2011, by Michael A. DeMayo

Public policy experts, passionate volunteers at Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), and practically every citizen of North Carolina would no doubt appreciate some magical policy that reduces North Carolina’s car accident rate to 0 or near 0. We all think that such a magical policy is a fiction. And in a practical sense, that may be right. But that doesn’t mean that such a solution doesn’t exist. It’s just that we don’t want to accept it.

That all sounds a little abstract. Consider this argument:

One study suggests that the higher the posted speed limit on a given road, the more, and much worse, accidents will occur. This isn’t always true. But it is a general heuristic that we can use to think about North Carolina car accidents more constructively. In other words, if we could lower speed limits instead of raising them, we should be able to lower accident rates substantially. So, for every road where the speed limit is 60 miles per hour, say we slash that to 55 miles per hour. We should expect accident rates to decrease across the board.

But what if we took this hypothetical to its extreme? What if, instead of slashing from 60 to 55, we slashed from 60 to 10 or 5 miles per hour?

Now, no one wants to drive 10 miles per hour everywhere they go. That would be highly impractical. But it would solve our – or at least nearly solve – the persistent problem of traffic accidents, which take the lives of 40,000 people in the U.S. every year and lead to untold millions of accidents and injuries.

No one would accept this bargain because the price would come too high at the cost of convenience. So, this hypothetical leads us to confront and accept the idea that convenience matters to us, just as safety does. And that we’re collectively negotiating and renegotiating the fine line between “what is convenient for me and North Carolina” and “what is safe for me and the rest of North Carolina.”

For insights into how to deal the aftermath of a car, motorcycle, truck crash, look to a client focused North Carolina auto accident law firm to spell out your strategic options.

More Web Resources:

Lowering speed limits saves lives

how low should we go?

The Power of Looking More Deeply at Your North Carolina Truck Accident

July 26, 2011, by Michael A. DeMayo

A North Carolina truck accident destroyed your day. Now what?

Whether an 18-wheeler skidded off a road and smashed into your Porsche, giving you a horrific case of whiplash and a few broken bones to boot; or a speeding drunk driver in a pickup truck blew through a stop sign and T-boned your car, seriously injuring you and two fellow passengers, you (and possibly your fellow defendants) may have already “come to conclusions” about what went wrong, why the trucker hurt you, and who should be to blame.

Your instincts might be right. But they might not be.

For instance, say the trucker had been yapping on a cell phone when he blew through the stop sign. Chances are, he should be held liable for the damages that you and your fellow passengers (and your vehicle) experienced.

However, if you use this kind of superficial analysis of your North Carolina truck accident, you may do yourself a serious disservice. You may artificially limit the number of possible defendants who can be called to task for your injuries, etc. And if the trucker has no assets — or insurance — you may not be able to collect the compensation you need.

So let’s revisit that example of the trucker who blew through the stop sign. And this time, let’s go more carefully. Perhaps the trucker had been working for a general contractor. And perhaps that general contractor failed to screen him effectively before hiring him. In other words, maybe the guy had a criminal record and a history of drug and alcohol abuse. Maybe he was driving on a suspended license. Now, because the general contractor neglected to do due diligence – and sent this guy out on the road or who was obviously ill-equipped to drive – the contractor himself (and his business, his insurance company, etc) could all also be held liable.

This is so important. After all, as we discussed above, perhaps the trucker himself lacked insurance and lacked significant assets to help pay for your substantial damages – which could ultimately be in the range of several hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The contractor and his insurance company, however, may have ample assets to pay for those damages and much more. Do you see? The difference between probing the case to locate this surprising defendant and just going with your superficial instinct can be the difference between collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages and collecting next to nothing at all.

A North Carolina truck accident law firm can analyze your case and ensure that no stone goes unturned in the quest for possible liable parties.

Double Hit and Run North Carolina Car Accident Almost Too Distributing to Write About

June 30, 2011, by Michael A. DeMayo

One of the most disturbing North Carolina car accidents in years occurred in Craven County, NC, last week on Highway 17. 25-year-old Jennifer Lynn Bond was banging on apartment doors early in the morning, trying to get someone to call the police to say that she had been raped.

No one answered her cries for help.

She wound up drunk and passed out on Highway 17. According to a Highway Patrol Trooper, shortly after she passed out, a dual axle commercial truck struck Bond and drove off – a lethal hit and run. Minutes later, a second car – this one a passenger vehicle – struck Bond a second time and AGAIN drove off without stopping.

So not only was this poor 25-year-old raped and then ignored by people when she sought help… but then two cars struck and killed her… and both drivers didn’t stop.

It’s North Carolina car accident stories like these that really challenge one’s faith in humanity and in the decency of people.

How could this have happened? How could so many people act so callously towards this young woman? And how can we as a society cope with this tragedy – not just to ensure that it doesn’t happen again but also to find justice and lessons here?

According to WNCT.com, investigators at this time do have a lead on the passenger vehicle that hit Bond the second time. But the driver of the truck that hit her has not been identified or found.

One would like to chalk this tragedy up to a single callous event… that it doesn’t actually speak to the quality and character of the people of North Carolina. But it’s difficult to put the accident into a humane context.

One potentially more “postive” way of looking at it (if one can even justify the use of that word in this context – doubtful) is that the people involved weren’t necessarily evil – they simply were ignorant or inattentive or scared or some combination thereof.

For instance, maybe the truck driver who hit her the first time didn’t see her because she was passed out on the road. Hard to believe, but it is at least theoretically possible.

Unfortunately, victims’ rights do get trampled and lost, which is why it’s so important that if you or someone you care about has been hurt or injured in a motor vehicle accident that you connect with a North Carolina car accident law firm to fight forcibly for your rights, hold wrongdoers to account, and get recovery for damages like your lost wages, time off of work, medical and surgical bills, and wrongful death damages.

More Web Resources:

Jennifer Lynn Bond accident


Hit & Run Victim and Driver Identified‎

Could the “VIP for a VIP” Program Reduce North Carolina Auto Accidents?

April 20, 2011, by Michael A. DeMayo

According to WECT, this past week, the North Carolina Highway Patrol has been traveling around to high schools throughout Columbus County in a bid to tamp down on the number of North Carolina auto accidents through its “VIP for a VIP” program.

Dismayed by statistics that suggest that over 276 teens have died in just four years, highway patrol officers want students to appreciate on a visceral level the dangers of driving while distracted. As prom season approaches, troopers, families, and school administrators alike worry about potential drug and alcohol abuse.

Students will be asked to sign something called a “zero tolerance contract” for drugs and alcohol. The VIP for a VIP program (stands for “vehicle injury prevention for a very important person”) includes a disturbing life-like reenactment of a fatal auto accident — students have to watch this. So first they listen to facts and figures about the dangers of inattentive, DUI, and careless driving; then they see the brutal consequences of ignoring safety measures.

The big question is: Will the VIP for a VIP program work?

In theory, it all sounds nice. The idea is simply to train students to be alert to dangers and to “get the message to sink in” using graphic demonstrations of the power of autos to kill and maim.

The utility of such programs, however, can be difficult to measure.

Will North Carolina auto accidents among teens decrease after the rollout of this program? And even if the numbers get better, can you credit the program, or might another factor be responsible? Picking out “cause and effect” in a car accident data can be a fraught business. If you blame the wrong cause, the adjustments you make to policy can have dangerous affects.

Consider the old tale about the drunk searching for his keys under a street light. A police officer comes up to him and asks “Is this where you dropped your keys?” To which the drunk replies, “No, but this is where the light is.” The moral here is: it’s easy to “look where the light is.”

But to prevent accidents, we might do well by expanding our view of possible policy solutions. For instance, instead of just instructing teenagers once about the dangers of DUI and driving while text messaging; perhaps teens should be put through a series of programs – one every few months or so. This way, their visceral understanding of auto accident dangers won’t wane over time. After all, good data suggest that human beings need to re-learn new ideas multiple times. One exposure to scary information about car crashes may not be enough. We may need to show kids the dangers many many times before they deeply get it and change their habits accordingly.

If you or someone you care about has been hurt and needs legal advice, connect with a North Carolina auto accident law firm to go over your rights and figure out strategies to get fair compensation.

More Web Resources:

VIP for a VIP program

North Carolina Highway Patrol